With emissions regulations getting ever stricter, many ship owners are turning to alternative fuels to power their vessels. Liquified natural gas (LNG) is proving a popular choice – and for good reason. Want to know more about LNG as fuel? Get an expert overview in 17 important questions.
CIMC ENRIC contains other products and information you need, so please check it out.
Your choice of fuel affects both your profitability and your vessel’s environmental compliance. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is a safe and cost-effective fuel that reduces greenhouse gas emissions and other harmful pollutants. LNG is playing a key role as a transition fuel and is widely seen as the first step towards decarbonising the maritime industry.
Switching to LNG as fuel for ship propulsion requires investment but can save you fuel costs, increase your profitability and reduce compliance risks. The expert answers to these 17 questions will tell you what you need to know about LNG as an alternative fuel for shipping.
LNG is natural gas that has been cooled to -162°C (-260°F), turning it into a clear, odourless liquid that is easy to ship and store. LNG is typically 85–95% methane, which contains less carbon than other forms of fossil fuels. It is a compact, efficient form of energy that is ideal for ship propulsion.
LNG is primarily used as a clean-burning energy source. It is used for electricity generation, heating, cooking, and as a transportation fuel. LNG is also used as a raw material for products like fertilisers and plastics.
In the shipping industry, LNG as fuel is used for ship propulsion, auxiliary power generation and other onboard energy needs. LNG as an alternative fuel for shipping has gained wide popularity due to its clean-burning properties and potential to help meet stricter emissions regulations.
Handpicked related content: Want to know more about a whole range of alternative fuels? Get the lowdown on future fuels in shipping – and discover which one might be right for your vessel.
LNG as fuel for ships is produced from natural gas extracted from underground reserves, including both onshore and offshore gas fields.
BioLNG is LNG produced from biogas, which is generated from organic waste like food scraps, agricultural waste, manure and sewage sludge. BioLNG is considered a renewable fuel and can further reduce the carbon footprint of ships using LNG fuel systems.
LNG is primarily methane (typically 85–95%), but it also contains small amounts of ethane, propane and other hydrocarbons. LNG can also contain trace amounts of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. The exact composition of LNG may vary depending on the source of the natural gas and the liquefaction process used.
Compared to diesel fuel oil, LNG offers several advantages. LNG produces significantly lower emissions when burned, including:
LNG engines are also quieter.
However, LNG has a lower energy density than diesel, so using LNG as an alternative fuel for shipping will require more fuel and therefore larger fuel tanks to achieve the same range.
The key advantages of LNG as fuel include reduced emissions and cost competitiveness. There is also an established and continuously growing global network of LNG bunkering facilities.
The disadvantages of using LNG as fuel for ships include the need for specialised equipment and training and the potential for methane slip.
Methane slip is when unburned methane, a potent greenhouse gas, escapes into the atmosphere. Modern dual-fuel engines will minimise this issue. Depending on engine type and load, you can reduce methane slip by up to 65% by upgrading your ship’s existing engines. Over the last 30 years, Wärtsilä has reduced the methane slip from its engines by around 90%.
Handpicked related content: Are you looking for ways to be smarter about methane slip? Discover the dramatic improvements you can make – today.
LNG is cleaner burning than traditional marine fuels, but it is still a fossil fuel. BioLNG, which is LNG produced from organic waste or biomass, can be considered a more sustainable alternative to fossil-based LNG as it has a lower carbon footprint. However, the production and combustion of bioLNG still emit some greenhouse gases. LNG can be seen as a bridging fuel in the transition to alternative fuels like methanol and ammonia, which aren’t yet widely available at scale.
LNG both is and isn’t a future fuel. It enables lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduces other harmful air pollutants compared to fuel oil, but it is still a fossil fuel. Sustainable future fuels are crucial for maritime decarbonisation, but the current cost, limited availability and insufficient infrastructure are challenging for operators. This gives LNG an important role to play in the shipping industry’s transition to a zero-carbon future.
As more ports develop LNG bunkering infrastructure and more ships are built with LNG fuel systems, the use of LNG as an alternative fuel for shipping is expected to increase. LNG is considered a stepping stone on the path to decarbonisation as the industry moves closer to using true future fuels such as methanol and ammonia.
Handpicked related content: What actions do policymakers, industry and individual ship operators need to take to achieve sustainable shipping by ? This report reveals the three key elements of success.
There are two main problems with LNG as fuel. Firstly, specialised equipment and training are needed to handle LNG safely. Secondly, LNG is predominantly methane and when burned as fuel unburned methane can escape into the atmosphere. This is known as methane slip and can offset LNG’s environmental benefits because methane is a potent greenhouse gas.
Modern dual-fuel engines can minimise methane slip – in fact, Wärtsilä has reduced methane slip from ship engines by around 90% over the last three decades through engine upgrades and ongoing research and development.
Handpicked related content: Looking for ways to reduce methane slip? This 60 min webinar shares five winning tactics – and one bonus tactic – with little or no additional investment needed.
Short on time? This five-minute article will give you simple solutions to reduce your methane slip today.
There is also a third problem in some areas where the limited availability of LNG bunkering facilities can be an additional barrier to adoption. Despite these challenges, LNG offers a great opportunity for vessels to reduce emissions and is widely seen as a good first step towards decarbonisation.
LNG is often described as a transition fuel because it provides a good first step towards other alternative fuels. Sustainable fuels will be crucial to maritime decarbonisation, but the current cost, limited availability and insufficient infrastructure can make them a challenging choice for operators.
Converting to LNG is a concrete step towards decarbonisation that vessel owners can take today, helping them to reduce emissions and comply with increasingly strict regulations. Conversion also opens up the possibility to use bioLNG and, eventually, synthetic methane.
LNG produces about 20–30% less CO2 when burned compared to traditional marine fuels like heavy fuel oil (HFO). The exact reduction in CO2 emissions depends on things like engine type, operating conditions and the specific composition of the LNG fuel.
The company is the world’s best lng tank container supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.
Burning LNG releases about 2.75 kg of CO2 per kg of fuel, while HFO emits around 3.15 kg. While there have been some concerns about methane slip, the latest LNG engine technologies and best practices in LNG handling and storage can help minimise this. Additionally, using bioLNG, which is produced from organic waste, can further reduce the carbon footprint of ships that use LNG as fuel.
While LNG is not a zero-carbon fuel, it does offer a significant reduction in CO2 emissions compared to traditional marine fuels. This gives LNG an important role to play in the shipping industry's decarbonisation efforts until fully renewable alternative fuels are more widely available.
The lifecycle emissions of LNG depend on factors like methane slip during production and transport, energy sources used for liquefaction and engine efficiency.
LNG produces 20–30% less CO2 when burned compared to heavy fuel oil, but methane slip can negatively offset this benefit. Engine manufacturers like Wärtsilä have been working hard to reduce methane slip. Since , the methane slip from Wärtsilä dual-fuel engines has been reduced by around 90%, taking it from 16 grams per kilowatt hour (kWh) to less than two grams today. Wärtsilä is working on reducing methane slip even further, to less than 1 gram per kWh. When running an engine at optimal load, methane slip can now be minimal.
While Wärtsilä is focusing on reducing tank-to-wake emissions through engine development, producers are working to minimise well-to-tank emissions. They are doing this by investing in carbon capture, using renewable energy to decarbonise energy-intensive processes like liquefaction, and closely monitoring pipelines for emissions.
The shipping industry contributes just 2% of global CO2 emissions but 12% of SOx emissions and 13% of NOx emissions. Switching to LNG as an alternative fuel for shipping reduces emissions across the board, cutting NOx emissions by 85–90%, reducing particulate emissions and completely eliminating SOx emissions.
According to a study by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of LNG can be up to 15% lower than those of heavy fuel oil when considering a 100-year timeframe. Using bioLNG, which is produced from organic waste, can significantly reduce lifecycle emissions, as the CO2 released during combustion is offset by the CO2 absorbed by the organic matter when it is growing.
The global LNG market is expected to grow significantly in the coming years, driven by increasing demand for cleaner energy sources. According to a report by Shell, the global LNG trade is projected to rise by 21% by compared to levels. The expansion of LNG bunkering infrastructure, with 235 ports offering LNG refuelling by , is making LNG more accessible for the shipping industry.
Many modern LNG tankers use LNG as fuel for ship propulsion and auxiliary power generation. These vessels are often referred to as LNG-fuelled LNG carriers. As newer LNG tankers enter the market and older vessels are phased out, the proportion of LNG tankers using LNG as fuel is expected to increase. This is for three main reasons:
In there were more than 2,400 vessels equipped to operate on LNG globally, with another 1,000 LNG-fuelled vessels on order. These include over 20 cruise ships – many of which are using Wärtsilä LNG solutions – as well as tankers, containerships and RoRo ferries.
Handpicked related content: Discover the LNG-powered Francisco – the world’s fastest high-speed ferry.
LNG is an attractive alternative marine fuel because it has a lower environmental impact than HFO. It produces significantly less SOx, NOx and particulate matter emissions, helping ships meet stricter regulations. Using LNG as fuel can also reduce CO2 emissions by 20–30% compared to heavy fuel oil.
Additionally, LNG is cost-competitive and increasingly available worldwide, with a growing number of bunkering ports. As the shipping industry seeks to decarbonise, LNG is seen as a viable transitional fuel until alternative fuels like green methanol and carbon-free green ammonia become widely available.
LNG is already playing a significant role in the shipping industry’s transition to cleaner fuels. Its lower emissions and increasing availability make an LNG fuel system an attractive option for many shipowners.
As the industry works towards the IMO's goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50% by , LNG is seen as a transition fuel, paving the way for the adoption of alternative fuels like green methanol and carbon-free green ammonia. This makes investing in flexible dual-fuel engine technology the safest path forward, using LNG as a first step towards a carbon-free future.
Today, the United States is the world’s largest producer of natural gas. Natural gas supplies about 1/3 of the United States’ primary energy consumption, with its primary uses being heating and generating electricity. While the majority of natural gas is delivered in its gaseous form via pipeline in the United States, the growth in the international market for natural gas has given rise to the use of natural gas in a liquefied form, or LNG.
LNG Basics
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas that has been cooled to a liquid state, at about -260° Fahrenheit, for shipping and storage. The volume of natural gas in its liquid state is about 600 times smaller than its volume in its gaseous state. This process makes it possible to transport natural gas to places pipelines do not reach.
Liquefying natural gas is a way to move natural gas long distances when pipeline transport is not feasible. Markets that are too far away from producing regions to be connected directly to pipelines have access to natural gas because of LNG. In its compact liquid form, natural gas can be shipped in special tankers to terminals around the world. At these terminals, the LNG is returned to its gaseous state and transported by pipeline to distribution companies, industrial consumers, and power plants.
LNG Trade
For large-volume ocean transport, LNG is loaded onto double-hulled ships, which are used for both safety and insulating purposes. Once the ship arrives at the receiving port, LNG is off-loaded into well-insulated storage tanks, and later regasified for entrance into a pipeline distribution network.
LNG can also be shipped in smaller quantities, usually over shorter ocean distances. There is a growing trade in small-scale LNG shipments, which are most commonly made using the same containers used on trucks and in international trade, specially outfitted with cryogenic tanks. Other small-scale LNG activities include “peak-shaver” liquefaction and storage facilities, which can hold gas compactly for when it is needed in local markets in the U.S. during times of peak demand. LNG is also sometimes imported or exported by truck from this kind of facility.
In , the U.S. exported almost 2,400 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas in the form of LNG in large LNG tanker ships, along with a small quantity shipped by container or in trucks. In total, as of August , U.S. LNG has been delivered to 40 countries on five continents. The U.S. also still imports some LNG, mostly to New England, a region of the country constrained by limited pipeline and storage capacity.
DOE's Role
The Department of Energy has regulatory responsibilities related to LNG. Companies that want to export natural gas must get authorization to do so from DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM). The Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires DOE to make public interest determinations on applications to export LNG to countries where the U.S. does not have existing free trade agreements. FECM’s natural gas import-export regulatory program is implemented by the Division of Regulation in the Office of Regulation, Analysis, and Engagement.
There are two standards of review under the NGA for LNG export applications, based on destination countries. Applications to export LNG to countries with which the United States has a free trade agreement (FTA countries) or to import LNG from any source are deemed automatically in the public interest. The NGA directs DOE to evaluate applications to export LNG to non-FTA countries. DOE is required to grant export authority to non-FTA countries, unless the Department finds that the proposed exports will not be consistent with the public interest, or where trade is explicitly prohibited by law or policy. DOE acts on long-term LNG export applications to non-FTA countries after completing a public interest review that includes several criteria, including economic and environmental review of the proposed export. Typically, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has jurisdiction over the siting, construction, and operation of LNG export facilities in the U.S. In these cases, FERC leads the environmental impact assessments of proposed projects consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act, and DOE is typically a cooperating agency as part of these reviews. Obtaining a DOE authorization to export LNG to non-FTA countries is an important step for most projects in their path toward financing and construction.
Some of the companies that have LNG export authorizations from DOE have not reached final investment decisions on their projects. Construction of large facilities takes years to complete and costs billions of dollars. A complete list of long-term LNG export applications and their current status can be found in DOE’s Summary of LNG Export Applications.
DOE also promotes market transparency with published reports on LNG export volumes, destinations, and prices in its LNG Monthly Report. The first-ever exports of domestically-produced LNG from the lower-48 states occurred in February . Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC exported the first LNG tanker cargo from the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal in Louisiana, with a shipment to Brazil.
Want more information on lng iso container? Feel free to contact us.